PolyMarket did not answer the request for comment.
The polymarket, introduced to the market in 2020, gained importance last year as a way to set the result of the presidential election in the USA. During the polymarket election cycle and its supporters Broken forecast markets As an excellent method of predicting results than established surveys – as more productive “Source of truth.“But this proposal was questioned by the defeat of Zelensky Rut.
“Everyone knows the answer, but the system is now broken,” says Deepolice. “It’s a fucking situation.”
PolyMarket reserves the right to overthrow the UMA result. Last year the company Carefully voting UMA According to the plant, whether Barron Trump was involved in the Trump cryptocurrency project. At that time the Polimarket Returned Bettors And he clearly described the application of Jew as “bad”. However, the company did not enter every time. In March, the plant by $ 7 million on whether Ukraine and the United States will reach a contract on access to minerals prematurely resolved with the wrong result. At that time, in a message that is incompatible to the affected users, a police employee He called it “an unprecedented situation” But he said he would not return the concrete.
Polymarket users, surprised by the likely result of the Zelensk forecasting market, accumulate at the non -compliance of the message platform to coordinate the answer, potentially in this leading a lawsuit against PolyMarket and UMA, they claim.
“I’m going to join the lawsuit,” says Bettor Polymarket by the opponent of the username, who won $ 300,000 at the plant at one stage before they pulled the funds in response to the confusion. “I have experienced moral compensation in connection with this defeat, and the additional context caused great stress.”
People from the UMA channel are similarly hugging the controversy, and the community members accuse each other of “Backchannel agreement” and fraud. Some perceive this as an unflattering referendum in the entire project. “This is not only voting for a lawsuit – it is voting on the future of UMA,” wrote one of the members.
The final resolution is expected in the evening of July 8. The co -founder of UMA, Hart Lumbur, claims that the organization plans to introduce the process of resolving disputes in the lightweight of controversy regarding Zelensky, but rejects the allegation that the vote has been manipulated in any way.
“There is no evidence of UMA manipulation. I really don’t like these unfounded accusations,” says Lamburid. “After the dust in this suit market, I can’t wait for a productive conversation about improvements and design compromises.”
Others perceive this kind of dispute as a natural part of this process: “For me it was a jacket that looked like a suit, but was not a suit,” says Lancelot Chardonnet, who voted as a delegate on behalf of the uma.rocks tokens pool, which controls about 0.1 percent of total supply. “This controversy simply reflects that the truth is complex and differs from one person to another.”
All this heat appears at a critical moment for PolyMarket, which is located during the aggressive round of collecting funds run by the founders of Peter Thiel; According to Reuters, the forecast market will be valued for $ 1 billion. This is not an ideal time for the alienation of some of the most energetic users or the integrity of its markets. “The silence of the polymarket was deafening,” says Deserpolice.