White House Management and Budget Office (OMB) issued two notes Aimed at the heads of all departments and agency of executive branches establishing policy regarding federal artificial intelligence and the purchase of artificial intelligence in the government.
Notes that comply with Executive order President Donald Trump signed in January, replace the previous guidelines Biden (M-24-10 AND M-24-18), but keep some of the same recommendations.
First note (M-25-21) Directs agencies to “reduce the burden of bureaucratic restrictions and to build effective principles and processes in the timely implementation of” artificial intelligence.
The note requires agencies to accelerate the apply of artificial intelligence, focusing on three priorities: innovations, management and public trust.
He says that agencies must maximize existing investments, re -use of data, models and code and the priority of AI products developed by the USA. It emphasizes the need for “solid risk management, especially in the case of” AI with high impact “.
“Because agencies integrate AI with critical decision -making processes, they are reminded that speed cannot come at the expense of public trust or security,” says the note.
The note defines “AI with a high influence” as “AI with a production that serves as the main basis for decisions or actions with the law, material, binding or significant influence” on many factors, including human health and security.
“In the contexts of medically, relevant functions of medical devices; patient diagnosis, risk assessment or treatment; allocation of care in the context of public insurance; or control of health insurance costs and insurance” are considered to be used cases of high impact, in accordance with Memo.
The Directive maintains certain biden administration policies, including the requirement to identify the main AI officers and their inter -welfare council, and the establishment of a specialized supervision process of “high influence” of applications.
Second note (M-25-22) provides guidelines for the purchase of artificial intelligence in the government, which are similar to Biden guidelines. The note is distinguished by three topics: a competitive artificial intelligence market, which follows the performance of artificial intelligence, while managing the risk and promoting the acquisition of artificial intelligence through interfunctional involvement.
However, the note adds a up-to-date policy of buying American and “maximizing the use of AI products and services developed and produced in the United States.”
In addition, it adds a 200-day date for the General Services Administration (GSA) in order to coordinate with OMB to develop an “internet repository, available only to executive agencies, to facilitate the provision of information, knowledge and resources regarding the acquisition of artificial intelligence.”
Coordination of OMB and GSA was also part of the biden note, but its tips were not provided with any requirement.
Greater trend
President Trump withdrew Biden in 2023, executive order of the first day of office during its second term.
The order of Biden aimed to establish standards of sheltered, sheltered and trustworthy development of artificial intelligence in various sectors, including healthcare. This required HHS to establish the AI security program and programmers to share the test results, including directives.
Trump executive order “Initial reception of harmful orders and actions“It included the dismissal of Biden ordinance, along with 66 other executive orders signed by Biden and 11 presidential Memorands.
Shortly after dismissal, Trump has signed an executive order In AI, stating that “the United States has long been at the forefront of innovation of artificial intelligence, driven by the strength of our free markets, world -class research institutions and the spirit of entrepreneurship.”
He said that in order to maintain leadership, the US must develop AI systems “free of ideological prejudices or designed social programs.”
In 2019, during the first term, Trump has signed an executive order to stimulate American innovations of AI. The Order called on the government to promote technical education and practices and boost STEM and computer science in schools and universities, especially for women and girls.
Other regulations included increasing the access of AI researchers to federal data and other computing resources; calling for regulatory agencies to determine the guidelines for the development and apply of AI in the entire economy, including healthcare; Directing Nist to develop technical standards and safety for AI systems; and “promoting a responsible approach to artificial intelligence by encouraging technology to transform us.