The final category of Deepseek information reserves the right to collect, there are data from other sources. For example, if you create a Deepseek account using Google or Apple, it will receive some information from these companies. Advertisers are also shared with Deepseek information, its rules say what may include “mobile advertising identifiers, E -mail addresses and phone numbers and cookie identifiers that we use to match you and your actions outside the service.”
How Deepseek uses information
Huge amounts of data can flow to China from the international database of Deepseek users, but the company still has power over the exploit of information. The Deepseek privacy policy claims that the company will exploit data in many typical ways, including providing services, enforcing its conditions and introducing improvements.
Most importantly, the company’s privacy policy suggests that it can exploit user prompts in developing novel models. The company “Looks, improve and develop the service, including by monitoring interaction and use on your devices, analyzing how people use it, and by training and improving our technology,” their rules say.
Deepseek Privacy Policy claims that the company will also exploit information to “follow [its] Legal obligations ” – Kocowa clause many companies contain in its terms. The Deepseek privacy policy claims that the data can be obtained by the “corporate group” data and will provide information with law enforcement agencies, public authorities and others when required.
These provisions, along with growing commercial tensions between the USA and China and other geopolitical factors, have fueled security concerns about Tiktok. The application can collect huge amounts of data and send it back to China, in favor of the Tiktok ban, and the application can also be used to push Chinese propaganda. (Tiktok has negative Sending user data to the China government.) Questions in a way that sounds like propaganda.
Willemsen claims that in comparison with users on the social media platform, such as Tiktok, people send messages with the AI generative system are more actively involved, and the content may seem more personal. In miniature, any influence can be greater. “The risk of a precedent change in content, direction of conversation, in active commitment should lead to greater care, no less,” he says, “especially considering how the internal operation of the model is unknown, its thresholds, borders, borders, borders, boundaries , borders, borders, borders, limits of control, censorship and intentions/personality principles left largely and is already so popular at the stage of infancy. “
Olejnik from King’s College London says that although the ban on Tiktok was a specific situation, American lawyers or people from other countries could act again in a similar premise. “We cannot rule out that 2025 will bring expansion: direct action against AI companies,” says Olejnik. “Of course, collecting data can be named as a reason.”
Updated 17:27 EST 27 January 2025: Additional details have been added regarding the activities of the Deepseek website.