May 16 2023, Altman himself appeared Before the subcommittee of the Senate of the Judiciary. The title of the audition was: “Overight of Ai”. The session was the most vital, both Altman and Senators celebrated what Altman called AI “Press Press moment”, as well as the recognition that the US needed robust laws to avoid their piles dropped. More and more powerful models – said the legislators. Altman spoke on behalf of the industry, which widely shared his attitude. Battle cry was “Adjust us!”
Two years later, on May 8 this year, Altman returned to another group of senators. Senators and Altman still sang the same melody, but one pulled out of another playlist. This interrogation was called “rolling the AI race”. Instead of following external organs to examine AI models to assess risk or platforms for warning people during interaction with AI, the chairman of the Ted Cruz committee argued about a path in which the government not only sent innovations, but removed barriers such as “regulation”. Altman was on board. His message was no longer “regulate me”, but “investing in me”. He said that excessive regulation – just like the rules adopted by the European Union or recently one bill recently laws Methed in California It would be “Disastry”. “We need space to introduce innovation and quick movement,” he said. Safety certainty may be necessary, confirmed, but they had to include “regulation that does not slow us down”.
What happened? First of all, the panicing moment just after everyone was terrified by Chatgpt, and it became clear that Congress did not move quickly to AI. But the greatest development is that Donald Trump suffered a white house and hit the nuance tone of the biden administration pro-regulation. Trump’s doctrine AI seems suspiciously similar to the supporter of Trump Marc Andreessen, who announced in his own Techno Optimist manifesto The fact that the AI regulation was literally a form of murder because “any AI will cost life”. JD Vance vice president clearly made these priorities clear at the international meeting in Paris this February this year. “I am not here” “We believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector can kill a transformation industry, as you start, and we are trying to encourage AI’s policy. Action plan AI “To strengthen America’s position as AI’s power and prevent unnecessarily burdensome requirements for innovation in the private sector.”
Two enemies appeared in this movement. The first is the European Union that has accepted Regulatory diagram This requires transparency and responsibility from the main AI companies. The White House despises this approach, like people building AI in the USA.
But China is the greatest Bogeyman. The perspective of the Republic of the People defeating the US in the “race” is so unthinkable that the regulations should be put aside or do what both Altman and Cruz described as a “featherlight touch”. Some of this reasoning comes from the theory known as known as a theory known as a theory known as a known theory “Start -Ff” Which assumes that AI models can reach a turning point, in which lightning quickly self -improvement triggers the stunning gyre super -rapeum, also known as Aga. “If you get there first, you are a wicked person, I will not be able to catch you” Says former general director of Google Eric SchmidtBecause “you” is a competitor (Schmidt spoke about the status of China as a leader in Open Source.) Schmidt is one of the most famous voices warning about this possible future. But the White House is probably less interested in peculiarity than in classic economic competition.
The fear of moving China forward is the key driving force of the current US policy, let security. The party line even opposes individual countries trying to fulfill a vacuum of inactivity with their own laws. Tax giving version, Medicaid Cuting Megabill just donated by the house, contained Mandated moratorium on any provisions regarding AI at the state level for 10 years. It’s like eternity in terms of AI’s progress. (The Pundits say that this provision did not survive a certain objection in the Senate, but it should be noted that almost every Republican in the chamber voted for this).