Last week Paul McCartney, Dua Lipa, Ian McKellen, Elton John and hundreds of others in the British artistic industry I signed an open letter Supporting effort to force AI to disclose works protected by copyright used to train their models. Support the amendment to Great Britain Data account (use and access) Proposed by the Organizer of the letter Beeban Kidron, adding a requirement that the UK government opposed.
The British Chamber of Lords passed yesterday, 272–125, Reports The GuardianAnd now he returns to the House of Commons, where the amendment could be removed again. The British government claims that the struggle for amendment “stops both creative and technological sectors and must be resolved by the new rules,” he writes The Guardian.
We will lose their great growth possibilities if we give our work on the order of a handful of powerful foreign technology companies, and with them our future income, the position of Great Britain as artistic power and any hopes that the technology of everyday life embodies the values and laws of Great Britain.
Also signed by many media companies, music publishers and artistic organizations, the letter insists that the changes will “stimulate the dynamic licensing market that will increase the role of human creativity in Great Britain, positioning us as a key player in the global AI supply chain.”
Companies such as Opeli and Meta have been accused in court of using copyrights protected by copyright without permission to train their models. Baroness Beeban Kidron, who made an amendment, writes that although the British artistic industries welcome artistic progress enabled by AI: “… as artificial intelligence is developed and whom he uses, they are the two most important questions of our time.”
“My gentlemen” The Guardian He quotes Kidron, saying yesterday: “It is an attack on the British economy and happens on a sector scale of 120 billion pounds for Great Britain, an industry that is crucial for industrial strategy and huge cultural imports.”