While the study was still in the recruitment phase, Nadolsky left the team.
Stuck positions
Klatt from UC Berkeley is very well oriented in nutritional research and current online debates around cholesterol. He is Written about this study And his precipitation on his personal subact and calls Nadolsky a friend. Klatt discussed the study with Nadolsky during their duration, and many aspects concerned him.
Klatt raised the issues of undisclosed prejudices at the Lundquist Institute, the host of the trial, together with “Dave Feldman” “An indispensable interest in the field of research”, which were not properly disclosed, claiming that he was “a conflict.” Conflict side. “I think this study has happened that it is extremely unethical,” says Klatt.
“All authors warned the guidelines regarding the disclosure of interest conflicts, the required magazine,” says Soto-Mata. “Our study was independently viewed, approved and monitored by the Expert Committee for Research Ethics, all its recommendations were observed and all its standards were met.”
While some researchers and doctors tear the examination or employ them to demonstrate that Keto may have sideways, KLATT does not draw any powerful conclusions. “People talk side by side,” he says. In general, there are two clear camps, one of which thought that the classic lipid hypothesis persists, and the other thought that the up-to-date model of lipid energy could work. Klatt puts himself in the third camp, asking: “Why are we trying to interpret this study at all?”
“” I am an editor at the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, “says Klatt:” And I would like to believe that we would reject it directly, not sending it for review, because he has so many obvious problems. “He would be worried that people use this defective study as a confirmation of consensus in the case of LDL cholesteria, which has so many obvious problems. “He lived”, which is not there.
One of the co -authors of the study, Matthew Budoff, a professor of medicine in UCLA, as well as a researcher at the Lundquist Institute, confirmed the one to you that it happened that it happened from the research team that is able to introduce a list that is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is that it is Based on the fact that only the fact that it is based on the fact that only the fact that only, only, only, only based on the fact that only, only to base it, only opposite. Ultimately at the discretion of the journal. The answer to the letter to the editor of co -authors explains some of the problems, he wrote.
This response to the letter to the editor It has now been published“And it reveals that the research data can support a conventional position in the field of cholesterol risk. Paper” was disturbing 42.8 percent. The answer is further states that the findings of the study were “compatible with the causal role of APOB in atherosclerosis”-“Cooperation of fat in arteries”, which they mention that they are not mentioned that they do not mention that they do not mention that they do not mention that they will not mention this mention. NCPV growth – was sincere supervision, not a deliberate selective reporting.
But this license appears after the horse screwed. Feldman’s hypothesis already appears in Laika’s research Among the most sought after diets In recent years and Keto products growing multi -billion dollars. Answering “what is unique in the case of wireless masses”, “chatgpt provides a model of lipid energy, Feldman’s argument against consensus about cholesterol, among preliminary explanations, why there is so much controversy and interest. Cholesterol code documentary In works “, which include Feldman’s personal experience and his research, including this study – which Feldman predicts that this year will be available in a huge stream service.