Categories

Sunday, May 4, 2025

It seems that Nih financing cuts attract the Heritage Foundation report, which explodes with “dei staff”

Share

The report from 2022 contains an analysis of 82 universities, an indirect cost indicator they receive from federal subsidies and the degree of indirect costs they receive from private founders, such as the Sloan Foundation, Gates Foundation and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. Ten schools in the analysis of the Heritage Foundation did not confirm their indirect cost rates for private founders, leaving 72 full entries in the analysis of the report.

Of the 72 universities, the report stated that 67 adopted private research on private research at the range of zero research costs – exactly the same analysis and determining as in the NIH notification.


Do you have a clue?

Are you the current or former employee of Nih or a scientist to whom this administration affected? We would like to hear from you. Using the phone or computer, contact our reporters safely on the signal on MattReynolds.45 and Emullin.06.


The Heritage Foundation report stated that only three schools in the attempt refuse to accept indirect cost rates from private foundations at lower rates than those that negotiated with the federal government. These schools are the University of Alabama in Birmingham, Massachusetts Institute for Technology and the University of Michigan.

The NIH notification refers to the same three schools without identifying the Heritage Foundation as a source of analysis. He mentions that Harvard required a minimum of 15 percent of intermediate costs from private founders, and the California Institute of Technology required a 20 -month coverage of indirect costs. These examples also appear in the Heritage Foundation report.

One of the authors of the report, a senior researcher Heritage Foundation, Jay Greene, says that he was not involved in the development of the NIH notification, but he admitted that one paragraph of NIH notification “seems to be a reference to our 2022 report”. Nih did not answer Wired’s request for comments.

The plan to reduce cost rates in federal subsidies also appears in the 2025 project, almost a thousand-page Plan of the Heritage Foundation Foundation Foundation for the second Trump presidency. “This market reform would help reduce the federal subsidization of leftist programs taxpayers,” we read in the report. During the presidential campaign, Trump consistently withdrew from any links to the Heritage Foundation and the 2025 project.

On Monday Coalition of 22 states He filed a lawsuit questioning the legality of the NIH attempt to reduce indirect costs.

Universities say that the hat hinders their ability to conduct significant research. “The discovery of new treatment methods slowed down, the possibilities of training the next generation of scientific leaders would decrease, and our national scientific and engineering fitness would be seriously threatened,” he wrote President Harvard Alan Garber in the post on the university’s website.

Some universities may lose over $ 100 million in federal financing if a recent subsidy limit is preserved. According to statusWeill Cornell Medicine brought $ 107 million indirect costs in 2022 – a number that would drop to $ 23 million if the rate was 15 percent.

Latest Posts

More News