Tan, who refused to determine whether he personally supports the ban on Tiktok, believes that the central problem is the enforcement of the law. “There is a federal law that says that the Tiktok application should not be in your store, and I see that Tiktok is in the App Store,” says Google. “Congress adopted the law and the Supreme Court maintained them. It is not debatable
In his opinion, Google openly ignores the law and wants to understand the legal basis of this decision, as well as the scope in which shareholders should worry about Google’s potential responsibility. “I felt that I should join someone who was doing something,” says Tan.
Books and records
Tan has the history of using records and court disputes to examine and combat what he considers as injustice. In 2019 Sued The recent Hampshire hotel for alleged violation of discrimination regulations by providing reservations from adults under 21 years aged. Tan says he dropped the case after changing the hotel.
In February, Tan applied for public documentation in the US Department of Justice in search of copies of letters that the Prosecutor General Pam Bondi reportedly sent to companies such as Google and Apple, advising them that they would not be responsible for continuing the distribution of Tiktok. After the office of the Prosecutor General stated that he had no provisions matching the Tan’s request, he took the Department of Justice to court. (Fresh York Times filed A similar claim.) In a court submission, the Department of Justice refused all offenses.
“Minute
They assessed the risk of responsibility – a tana claim filed on Tuesday. “Minutes of the management will also show whether the management has considered whether to provide a tiktok via Google Play is a positive violation of federal law.”
Companies that Disturb the ban By continuing the application distribution, he can face up to USD 5000 per user. Tana’s lawsuit claims that Google should not rely on the executive order of Trump and the Bondi letter himself to protect them against the law, and that the technological giant can be held responsible by the future president “, and even by Trump, who is often changing his opinion.
Gavril, a lawyer representing Google, fought in one exchange with lawyers representing Tan, that “many planets would have to adapt to this hypothetical damage to become a reality. Some say that the concerned shareholder should wait until it is a shame before he goes to examine, as it happened.