If you want to raise ungodly amounts of money, you better have some godly reasons.
That’s what Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says prepared for us on Friday in over 14,000 words: the out-of-this-world ways artificial general intelligence (AGI, though he prefers to call it “powerful AI”) will change our lives. On the blog entitled “The Grace-Loving Machine”, imagines a future in which artificial intelligence could compress 100 years of medical progress into a decade, cure mental illnesses such as post-traumatic stress disorder and depression, upload thoughts to the cloud, and alleviate poverty. At the same time, it is reported that Anthropic hopes to raise $40 billion in fresh funding.
Today’s artificial intelligence can do exactly none of what Amodei imagines. This will require, as he himself admits, calculations worth hundreds of billions of dollars to train AGI models built with trillion-dollar data centers that draw enough power from local power grids to keep the lights on in millions of homes. Not to mention that no one is 100% sure this is possible. Amodei himself says: “Of course, no one can know the future with any certainty or precision, and the effects of powerful artificial intelligence will likely be even more unpredictable than previous technological changes, so all of this will inevitably consist of guesswork.”
AI executives have mastered the art of making massive promises before mass fundraising. Take OpenAI’s Sam Altman, whose Blog “The Age of Intelligence”. preceded a stunning $6.6 billion round. On Altman’s blog, he stated that the world would have superintelligence in “a few thousand days,” which would lead to “enormous prosperity.” It’s a compelling show: paint a utopian future, suggest solutions to humanity’s deepest fears – death, famine, poverty – and then argue that only by removing Some thanks to unnecessary guardrails and the infusion of unprecedented capital, we can achieve this techno-paradise. It’s brilliant marketing, exploiting our greatest hopes and fears while conveniently bypassing the need for concrete evidence.
The timing of this blog also highlights how fierce the competition is. As Amodei points out, a 14,000-word utopian manifesto is completely out of place for Anthropic. The company was founded after Amodei and others left OpenAI for security reasons, and has gained a reputation for sober risk assessment rather than staring futurism. That’s why the company continues to employ security researchers from OpenAI. Even in last week’s post, he urged Anthropic to prioritize candid discussions about the dangers of artificial intelligence over seductive visions of techno-utopia.
“Technologists have long promoted their innovations as world-saving solutions.”
However, security is not an stimulating topic and fresh challengers appear every day. OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever launched his own AI lab and OpenAI CTO Mira Murati is leaving apparently it is starting your own venture. The Amodei blog isn’t just about selling your vision – it’s about staying competitive.
Despite his declared reluctance to make massive claims, he seems to thousands of words painting a future in which artificial intelligence could change the fate of humanity (this seems to fit Altman’s malice, which are legendary in tech circles). The post makes only one mention of alignment, or ensuring that AI systems operate in line with human values, and no mention of security. This contradiction exposes a stark truth: in the high-stakes world of AI development, even those who fear media hype are forced to play the game of massive promises to secure crucial funding.
Currently, there is an incredible gap between the capabilities of this technology and the utopia imagined by AI leaders. This has led to a lot of valid criticism – how will he change the world in just a few years if he can’t even reliably count the R number in the word “strawberry”? What artificial intelligence reliably excels at Now automates routine tasks and analyzes huge data sets, identifying patterns with ever greater precision. This power is already helping fields such as finance, medicine and autonomous vehicles. While these advances are impressive, claims like Amodei’s that AI can be “structurally conducive to democracy” seem premature and overly hopeful. It’s worth noting that AGI followers are wondering about his blog post be a little too tame (which Amodei predicted on his blog, writing in the footnotes that they should “touch the grass”).
Amodei’s blog post is not intended for the general reader interested in AI, nor is it a compelling roadmap for the future of AGI – again, something that does not exist and may never exist in the form the AI industry imagines. This is a proposition for investors: come back to Anthropic, and you are not just financing a company; you are buying a stake in humanity’s radiant future. This is what every AI executive promises – Altman at OpenAI, Elon Musk at xAI, Sergey Brin at Google – with varying degrees of subtlety. Join their vision of the future or be left behind.
Despite all the newness of artificial intelligence, tech titans have long promoted their innovations as world-saving solutions. Mark Zuckerberg quit universal Internet as a cure for poverty. Brin once said that Google can “cure death.” Musk defined SpaceX’s interplanetary ambitions as the ultimate contingency plan for our species (and, most recently, the necessity of voting for Donald Trump). However, when there is a finite amount of investor money in circulation, altruism is a zero-sum game. as tech mogul at Mike Judge’s Silicon Valley he famously put it: “I don’t want to live in a world where someone else makes it a better place than us.”
Amodei is well aware of the risks that may sound hyperbolic. “AI companies talking about all the amazing benefits of AI can seem like propagandists or like they are trying to distract from the flaws,” he writes. That doesn’t stop him from playing his part.
“It’s a thing of transcendent beauty,” Amodei concludes his blog. “We have an opportunity to play a small part in making this a reality.”
