Last month, OP-ED was published in the Wall Street Journal with a provocative header: “Why most companies should not have AI strategy. “
At this age, AI noise, in which each third word sometimes seems to be these two letters, a proposal, which is understandable, drawn a thrilling debate in the WSJ commentary.
As the author of OP-ED, Joe Peppard, academic director at the University College Dublin’s Smurfit Executive Development, writes:
Certainly, when it comes to healthcare, there are plenty of newly convex Caios, not several centers of perfection AI. But often these are generally, well -financed healthcare systems and academic medical centers. Should other, smaller healthcare providers also seriously accept artificial intelligence?
The motive matters. As one anonymous employee of the healthcare system he said Recently: “We have just signed AI’s many years of partnership so that we can say. If it improves care or performance, great, but let’s be honest, the management wanted a press release.”
Earlier it was noticed that the performance of artificial intelligence due to this – because everyone else is (or seems to be) or out of fear of lack – they can be ineffective, effective, and maybe even hazardous.
Should all healthcare providers look for at least some promising cases of using AI tools, even in restricted implementation? Or maybe for some organizations it can be more sensible to simply miss it? We recently reached Peppard in Ireland to talk about his WSJ column and a larger edition of “Ai Fomo” in healthcare and elsewhere. Here’s what he had to say.
How do you hear? Subscribe to the podcast on Apple podcastsIN Spotify Or Google Play!
Talking points:
-
What Peppard sees with adoption AI Biznes
-
“Nobody wants to stay behind and miss another big thing”
-
Perfection and Caios centers
-
Why many AI users “make a mistake”
-
“Doctors will not be replaced by artificial intelligence – but documents using AI will replace those who do not do it”
-
Why many organizations “did not do the required fundamental work” so that AI would be valuable investments
-
How AI was arranged inadequately or for the wrong reasons “distorting decisions”
-
Building infrastructure, implementing auxiliary technologies and accepting change management for AI
-
How to educate and train work force for AI success
More about this episode:
Why most companies should not have AI strategy (WSJ)
10 tips to avoid planting AI time bombs in your organization
Opinion: WHO is an unhealthy approach to artificial intelligence
AMA survey: More doctors using – but summer for trust
AI in RCM: Healthcare Execs optimists, but skeptical
AI mountains and traps in 2025.